Back

The Key Differences Between Collaborative Law and Mediation | Missouri

Kirk C. Stange | 846 Views | 03/09/2015

Collaborative law is very similar to mediation but there’s a couple of key differences. Again, the parties sit down, they talk. They try to have creative resolutions discussed amongst them, and the idea is that they can come to a resolution that works best for them versus simply having a judge decide it.

The key differences, however, is in collaborative law, you have an attorney who’s present with you during the collaborative proceedings, and these are attorneys that are trained in collaborative law. At Stange Law Firm, we’ve got attorneys that can help you if you need a collaborative divorce attorney. And then additionally, versus having a mediator, what you have in collaborative law is various professionals that can assist in the process. For example, financial neutrals can be present, help parties work through the financial issues that might take place in a case.

In some cases, there might be a lot of emotions, people might have hurt feelings in terms of the divorce. In these instances, a divorce coach can be useful to help the parties deal with the emotional issues that might take place in a case. And then you can have a custody professional as well, help give opinions in terms of what might be in the best interest of the kids in a particular case.

So collaborative law is kind of mediation plus because you have these various professionals that can help assist in the process. And I’d say, another key feature is your collaborative attorney can actually file the case in court and complete the divorce, unlike mediation, if an agreement is reached, and that is a key plus for collaborative law versus mediation. And then I would say, additionally, a good thing about collaborative law is there’s no court file littered with nasty motions, maybe embarrassing allegations. So if you’re able to do a collaborative divorce, it can be a good thing in terms of privacy.

By: Kirk C. Stange

The Key Differences Between Collaborative Law and Mediation | Missouri

Collaborative law is very similar to mediation but there’s a couple of key differences. Again, the parties sit down, they talk. They try to have creative resolutions discussed amongst them, and the idea is that they can come to a resolution that works best for them versus simply having a judge decide it.

The key differences, however, is in collaborative law, you have an attorney who’s present with you during the collaborative proceedings, and these are attorneys that are trained in collaborative law. At Stange Law Firm, we’ve got attorneys that can help you if you need a collaborative divorce attorney. And then additionally, versus having a mediator, what you have in collaborative law is various professionals that can assist in the process. For example, financial neutrals can be present, help parties work through the financial issues that might take place in a case.

In some cases, there might be a lot of emotions, people might have hurt feelings in terms of the divorce. In these instances, a divorce coach can be useful to help the parties deal with the emotional issues that might take place in a case. And then you can have a custody professional as well, help give opinions in terms of what might be in the best interest of the kids in a particular case.

So collaborative law is kind of mediation plus because you have these various professionals that can help assist in the process. And I’d say, another key feature is your collaborative attorney can actually file the case in court and complete the divorce, unlike mediation, if an agreement is reached, and that is a key plus for collaborative law versus mediation. And then I would say, additionally, a good thing about collaborative law is there’s no court file littered with nasty motions, maybe embarrassing allegations. So if you’re able to do a collaborative divorce, it can be a good thing in terms of privacy.

By: Kirk C. Stange